공지
- [ 2024-08-05 ] 보건복지부 국장급 개방형 직위(감사관) 공개모집 안내
- [ 2024-07-31 ] 『생명윤리 언론동향 브리프』 제14호 발간 안내
- [ 2024-07-30 ] [제64회 콜로키움] 디지털 전환의 사회적 영향과 대응방안 : 메타...
- [ 2024-07-25 ] 2024년도 하반기 기관생명윤리위원회 평가·인증 계획 추가 공고
- [ 2024-07-25 ] [ISSCR 가이드라인 한국어 번역본] 발행 안내
관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
lib@nibp.kr
글 수 4,668
| 발행년 : | 2010 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 국내학술지 |
| 학술지명 : | 民事法學 |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100416023 |
대리출산 자녀의 모자관계 결정기준
= Study on determining factors of legal maternity of the child born through gestational agreements
- 저자[authors] 권재문(Kwon Jae Moon)
- 학술지명[periodical name] 民事法學
- 권호사항[Volume/Issue] Vol.49No.1[2010]
- 발행처[publisher] 한국민사법학회
- 자료유형[Document Type] 학술저널
- 수록면[Pagination] 125-157
- 언어[language] Korean
- 발행년[Publication Year] 2010
- 주제어[descriptor] 대리모,대리출산,출산대리모,모자관계,친생자,일반입양,불완전입양,surrogate mother,parentage,maternity,open adoption
초록[abstracts]
[The development of bio-technology and medicine has created new problems associated with family law, especially the rule to decide who the parents of a new born baby are. Among these, the hottest issue may be the determination of legal maternity of the children born by gestational agreements. In this case, there can be three candidates, one who carried the child, another whose gamete was used for this process and the other who managed this process intending to become mother of the baby. But the literature on this issue can divided only two opinions, because the last two, that is, the gamete mother and the intent mother is the same person in general case. Then, who is the mother of such child? Before searching for the answer, it should not be overlooked that it doesn't need to be treated as a zero-sum game. In this respect, such solution as respects intention of all candidates is the best. It can be summarized as follows: Although a child is born through such agreement, the woman who was carrying or has carried a child as a result of the ART process should be treated as the mother of the child. It is true that some literature argues that the so-called intend mother be treated as the natural mother, but it seems to overlook that the intent mother can adopt the child under much easier condition than others. Thai is, the parties who intended to be parents and led the ART process can be legal parents only through the court order holding that a child to be treated in law as the child of the intending parties. In result, regarding the parentage of the children born by gestational agreements, the semi-adoption system is considered to be an alternative. Therefore, there is no reason to justify excluding gestational mother from the life of the child. In addition, given the complexity and diversity of the modern family, the law should allow that a child may have more than two parents and that parenthood should not necessarily be an all-or-nothing status.]
목차[Table of content]
Ⅰ. 서언 Ⅱ. 견해의 대립 Ⅲ. 입양가능성을 전제한 출산기준설의 새로운 논거 Ⅳ. 결론 〈참고문헌〉 〈Abstract〉
(†04522) 서울 특별시 중구 남대문로 113 DB다동빌딩 5층
TEL : 02-737-8970 (기획운영팀)
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
