공지
- [ 2024-08-05 ] 보건복지부 국장급 개방형 직위(감사관) 공개모집 안내
- [ 2024-07-31 ] 『생명윤리 언론동향 브리프』 제14호 발간 안내
- [ 2024-07-30 ] [제64회 콜로키움] 디지털 전환의 사회적 영향과 대응방안 : 메타...
- [ 2024-07-25 ] 2024년도 하반기 기관생명윤리위원회 평가·인증 계획 추가 공고
- [ 2024-07-25 ] [ISSCR 가이드라인 한국어 번역본] 발행 안내
관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
lib@nibp.kr
글 수 95
| 발행년 : | 2013 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 국내학술지 |
| 학술지명 : | 생명윤리정책연구 제7권 제2호 |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/3412825 |
영어 초록
Prior to giving consent to the treatment of a physician, a patient has to receive, as prerequisite, the information on what his/her disease and the relevant treatment are. The Physician’s duty to inform his/her patients is the prerequisite for the patient’s consent.
The medical ethics mainly deals with life and death of humans, while the notion of clinical ethics primarily deals with individual physicians and their professional ethics. Such issues dominate the field of clinical ethics as fraud on patients for medical purposes, patients’ refusal and consent, physician’s assistance in dying, the necessity and value of prior instruction and determination by the attorney-in-fact.
Medical policies and ethics shall be considered as wee, since individual physicians have to determine their relations with patients within the institutional frame. Further, the ethics matter becomes more prominent when it comes to experiments with clinical trials on humans.
Aware of the issues, this study intends to review what clinical conditions a clinical trial has to satisfy by reviewing the physician’s obligation to inform the patient from historic and ethical perspectives.
The medical ethics mainly deals with life and death of humans, while the notion of clinical ethics primarily deals with individual physicians and their professional ethics. Such issues dominate the field of clinical ethics as fraud on patients for medical purposes, patients’ refusal and consent, physician’s assistance in dying, the necessity and value of prior instruction and determination by the attorney-in-fact.
Medical policies and ethics shall be considered as wee, since individual physicians have to determine their relations with patients within the institutional frame. Further, the ethics matter becomes more prominent when it comes to experiments with clinical trials on humans.
Aware of the issues, this study intends to review what clinical conditions a clinical trial has to satisfy by reviewing the physician’s obligation to inform the patient from historic and ethical perspectives.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 설명의무의 개념과 연혁적 고찰
Ⅲ. 의료적 개입으로서 환자에 대한 설명
Ⅳ. 임상실무에서의 환자에 대한 설명의무
Ⅴ. 결론
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
Ⅱ. 설명의무의 개념과 연혁적 고찰
Ⅲ. 의료적 개입으로서 환자에 대한 설명
Ⅳ. 임상실무에서의 환자에 대한 설명의무
Ⅴ. 결론
[참고문헌]
[Abstract]
키워드
환자의 자기결정권, 의사의 설명의무, 의료윤리, 임상윤리, self determination, informed consent, medical ethics, clinical ethics
상세서지
- 발행기관 : 이화여자대학교 생명의료법연구소
- 자료유형 : 전자저널 논문
- 등재정보 : KCI 등재후보
- 작성언어 : 한국어
- 파일형식 : Text PDF
- KORMARC
- URL : http://www.dbpia.co.kr/Article/3412825
(†04522) 서울 특별시 중구 남대문로 113 DB다동빌딩 5층
TEL : 02-737-8970 (기획운영팀)
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
