공지
- [ 2024-07-31 ] 『생명윤리 언론동향 브리프』 제14호 발간 안내
- [ 2024-07-30 ] [제64회 콜로키움] 디지털 전환의 사회적 영향과 대응방안 : 메타...
- [ 2024-07-25 ] 2024년도 하반기 기관생명윤리위원회 평가·인증 계획 추가 공고
- [ 2024-07-25 ] [ISSCR 가이드라인 한국어 번역본] 발행 안내
- [ 2024-07-15 ] 『생명, 윤리와 정책』제8권 제2호 원고 모집 안내(~9/20)
관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
lib@nibp.kr
글 수 4,668
"잊혀질 권리"에 관한 유럽사법 재판소(ECJ) 판결의 유럽 법제상 의미와 우리 법제에 대한 시사점 / 최경진
1 윤리학 조회 수 109 추천 수 0 2017.04.26 14:12:05| 발행년 : | 2014 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 국내학술지 |
| 학술지명 : | 법학논총(Dankook Law Review) |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100125192 |
연구논문 : "잊혀질 권리"에 관한 유럽사법 재판소(ECJ) 판결의 유럽 법제상 의미와 우리 법제에 대한 시사점
= The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on "Right to be Forgotten" and Its Implications
= The Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union on "Right to be Forgotten" and Its Implications
- 저자명
최경진 ( Kyoung Jin Choi )
- 학술지명
법학논총(Dankook Law Review)
- 권호사항
Vol.38 No.3 [2014]
- 발행처
단국대학교 법학연구소(Institution of Law Dankook University)
- 자료유형
학술저널
- 수록면
47-92(46쪽)
- 언어
Korean
- 발행년도
2014년
- 등재정보
KCI등재
- KCI 피인용횟수
3
- 초록 (Abstract)
- Since the European Union started enacting the proposed EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) as a personal data protection scheme, the issue on ‘Right to be forgotten’ included in the original proposed GDPR became one of most controversial issues through the world. Such trend has influenced on Korea too and many discussions has been ongoing. Meanwhile, the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) made a landmark ruling related to Right to be forgotten in the case of Google Spain SL, Google Inc. v Agencia Espanola de Proteccion de Datos (AEPD), Mario Costeja Gonzalez. This judgment is highly likely to give big influence to Korea`s legal discussion as well as EU`s legislation. However, inaccurate or exaggerated introduction may cause misunderstanding easily, furthermore wrong policy or legislation. It is the reason why this paper has to be prepared. This paper pursues objectives to introduce exact fact and meaning of the judgment, analyze personal data protection laws of EU and Korea comparatively and suggest implications from ECJ judgment and EU legislation. After comparative analysis of ECJ judgment and EU laws, this made two suggestions as followings. First, Right to be forgotten, regardless of what title of the right is, is not an absolute right, but the right to be adjusted to the reasonable extent. Korean Personal Data Protection Act provides no threshold requirement to claim the right to erasure corresponding Right to be forgotten. But this must be modified for establishing proper requirement. Second, it is necessary to establish process or legal basis or standard to balance against other fundamental rights, such as freedom of expression and of the media. However, this paper and suggested implications from EU case are just a starting point. To build a reasonable personal data protection law scheme, more concrete study and discussion must be needed.
(†04522) 서울 특별시 중구 남대문로 113 DB다동빌딩 5층
TEL : 02-737-8970 (기획운영팀)
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
