관련 논문 - 배아의 윤리 : 인격 대 생명'의 논쟁을 중심으로 / 이을상

로그인

공지

[ 2024-07-30 ] [제64회 콜로키움] 디지털 전환의 사회적 영향과 대응방안 : 메타...
[ 2024-07-25 ] 2024년도 하반기 기관생명윤리위원회 평가·인증 계획 추가 공고
[ 2024-07-25 ] [ISSCR 가이드라인 한국어 번역본] 발행 안내
[ 2024-07-15 ] 『생명, 윤리와 정책』제8권 제2호 원고 모집 안내(~9/20)
[ 2024-07-12 ] 정책원 대표 홈페이지 이용자 만족도 및 사용편의성 조사 연장(20...

배아의 윤리 : 인격 대 생명'의 논쟁을 중심으로 / 이을상

14 재생산 기술 조회 수 101 추천 수 0 2016.12.16 10:59:15

nibp *.223.3.98 https://www.nibp.kr/xe/info4_3/78568

발행년 :	2013
구분 :	국내학술지
학술지명 :	의생명과 법
관련링크 :	http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100317346

배아의 윤리
: 인격 대 생명'의 논쟁을 중심으로 = Ethics of Embryo: Debate between Person and Life in the embryonic Problems

저자명
이을상(Lee Eul Sang)
학술지명
의생명과 법
권호사항
Vol.9 No.- [2013]
발행처
원광대학교 법학연구소
자료유형
학술저널
수록면
91-119(29쪽)
언어
-
발행년도
2013년
초록 (Abstract)
- This thesis is a study on an embryo has the condition of being human or not. Someone has to be regarded as human being, he/she has a right of living, which is derived from the being a person in the moral sense. We have naturally thought an embryo is h...

This thesis is a study on an embryo has the condition of being human or not. Someone has to be regarded as human being, he/she has a right of living, which is derived from the being a person in the moral sense. We have naturally thought an embryo is human, but today it becomes problematic whether an embryo is a human being or not. This argument has been raised by a rapid developing of biotechnology such as prenatal genetic screening, embryonic reproduction etc. In the biotechnology an embryo is surely not regarded as a human being, but only a living material. It can cause a deep moral injure to think an embryo is not a human being. For human being is a person in the moral sense, and a person has been only thought that can make us live freely. At last we have human dignity, when we live as a person. But the thought that an embryo is not a human being has brought about the possibility of 'a human being without person', which is conceived by P. Singer in his Practical Ethics(1991). Further more Singer criticizes a Kant's view of human dignity as a 'speciesm' in the basis of a concept of a human being without person. In this paper I have examined a historical origin of Singer's concepts, a human being without person firstly and a speciesm especially in comparison with Kant's view of human dignity nextly. I have also examined that Kant's concept of autonomy has to be substituted by 'self-disposability' in Singer's bioethical viewpoint, but Singer's viewpoint is also criticised by Sandel's 'ethics of genetic enhancement' lastly.