관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다. lib@nibp.kr
글 수 7
발행년 : 2005 
구분 : 국내학술지 
학술지명 : 한림법학 Vol.16 
관련링크 : http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76369733 

유전자검사와 유전자치료에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도 = Issues of Genetic Test, Gene Therapy and National Survey


  • 제어번호 : 76369733
  • 저자명 : 이인영(Lee In-young)
  • 학술지명 : 한림법학 FORUM(THE JOURNAL OF HALLYM LAW FORUM)
  • 권호사항 : Vol.16 No.- [2005]
  • 발행처 : 한림대학교 법학연구소
  • 자료유형 : 학술저널
  • 수록면 : 23-56(34쪽)
  • 언어 : Korean
  • 발행년도 : 2005년
  • KDC : 360
  • 주제어 : 유전자검사 ,유전자치료 ,유전공학 ,분배정의 ,생명윤리 ,Genetic test ,Gene Therapy ,Bioethics ,Distributional Justic ,Genetic Technology


초록 (Abstract)

Genetic technology including genetic test and screening, gene therapy and genetic enhancement is developing rapidly. As genetic technology and other technologies relevant to human biology are developed, society will faced a host of complex ethical, legal, and social issues. One of the most complex sets of issues involves our choices over who will access to these technologies. There is a great concern that the mischiefs of genetic technology may outstrip its benefits. In addition, another question has been raised who should benefit from the development of genetic technology. Problems of distributional justice arise under the condition of scarce resources. Whether achievements of genetic research should be distributed according to need or ability-to-pay needs to be answered.
The aim of this study is to investigate Korean citizens' perception on genetic technology and distributional justice, specifically focusing on application and limit of genetic test and screening, gene therapy and genetic enhancement.
A national survey was carried out using telephone interview from April 20th to May 20th in 2004. A total of 1,004 citizens (male : female = 48.2% : 51.8%) were randomly sampled in proportion to the number of population of 16 regions. The questionnaire consisted of 16 questions about overall impact of genetic technology, application of genetic test, potential for discrimination on the basis of genetic information, permissibility of and intent to use gene therapy, access to genetic technology, and so on.
First, 71.0% of the respondents perceived that the development of genetic technology would ensure healthier life whereas 17.8% were worried about its adverse effects. In terms of application of genetic test, 90.3% responded that genetic test would be helpful for finding missing children 71.2% for criminal investigation. 75.9% and 56% were worried about the adverse effects if genetic information was used for recruiting and subscribing to insurance, respectively. Given the benefits that people will obtain from genetic technologies, people will not be able to satisfy their demand.
In the past, society encountered shortages of supply of medical services. Sooner or later certain conditions must be satisfied in order for someone to gain access to genetic technologies.
Overall, Korean citizens seem to have both positive and negative perception on the development and use of genetic technology. They have intention to use genetic technology for treating diseases while they feel concern about potentials for genetic discrimination or genetic class. Achievements of genetic research should be distributed according to need or ability-to-pay needs. The government needs to play an important role in ensuring equal access to genetic technology for every citizen.



목차 (Table of Contents)

  • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
  • Ⅱ. 사회적 수용도 분석을 위한 조사 개요

    Ⅲ. 유전자검사에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도

    Ⅳ. 유전자치료에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도

    Ⅴ. 분배정의에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도

    Ⅵ. 결론

    ABSTRACT


  • List of Articles
    번호 제목 발행년 조회 수
    공지 ! 논문 정보 제공 게시판입니다.   11462
    7 15 유전학 인간유전체 연구와 개인 프라이버시 보호 방안 / 정창록 2015  324
    6 15 유전학 체육철학 : 유전자도핑과 생명윤리 -스포츠를 중심으로- / 이문성 2014  453
    5 15 유전학 한국의 인간 유전체 연구에 있어 개인 프라이버시권과 국제데이터공유원칙 적용의 문제점 / 김한나 외 2015  306
    » 15 유전학 유전자검사와 유전자치료에 관한 쟁점사항과 사회적 수용도 / 이인영 2005  445
    3 15 유전학 생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률 전부개정(안)과 바이오뱅크를 이용한 연구에서의 피험자 보호방안 / 이정현 2010  283
    2 15 유전학 생명윤리법 상 인체유래물 연구를 위한 심의 · 동의제도의 법적 검토 / 이한주 2015  242
    1 15 유전학 임상유전학의 ‘신 놀이’ 비판 : 도덕적 트랜스휴머니즘의 정립을 위한 시론 / 이을상 2014  515