관련 논문 - 임상시험 연구윤리에 대한 임상연구자들의 인식 및 태도 조사 / 손순영

로그인

공지

[ 2024-06-28 ] 2024년 하반기(7월) 유전자검사기관 종사자 교육 안내
[ 2024-06-12 ] 2024년 하반기 DTC 유전자검사기관 검사역량인증 사업 설명회 개...
[ 2024-06-11 ] 2024 연명의료결정제도 수기·영상 공모전 안내
[ 2024-06-05 ] [제63회 콜로키움] (구)독일 형법상 '업무상 자살 지원' 금지의 ...
[ 2024-06-05 ] 2024년 한국간호윤리학회 세미나 개최 안내(6/22(토))

임상시험 연구윤리에 대한 임상연구자들의 인식 및 태도 조사 / 손순영

18 인체실험 조회 수 223 추천 수 0 2016.11.16 10:08:31

nibp *.223.3.98 https://www.nibp.kr/xe/info4_3/76924

발행년 :	2011
구분 :	학위논문
학술지명 :
관련링크 :	http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12292037

임상시험 연구윤리에 대한 임상연구자들의 인식 및 태도 조사 = A study of a researcher's views and attitudes concerning human research ethics

http://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12292037

저자
손순영
형태사항
vii, 50p. : 도표 ; 26 cm
일반주기
단면인쇄임
부록수록
지도교수: 안형식
참고문헌: p 41-42
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사)-- 고려대학교 보건대학원 : 보건정책및병원관리학과 2011. 2
발행국
서울
언어
한국어
출판년
2011

초록 (Abstract)

Abstract A study of a researcher's views and attitudes concerning human research ethics Department of Health Policy and Hospital Management Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University (Supervising Professor : Hyeong-sik Ahn M.D, Ph.D) Objec...
Abstract A study of a researcher's views and attitudes concerning human research ethics Department of Health Policy and Hospital Management Graduate School of Public Health, Korea University (Supervising Professor : Hyeong-sik Ahn M.D, Ph.D) Objectives : This study aimed to step up clinical research ethics and figure out the needs of its education by reviewing domestic and foreign laws and systems of clinical research ethics and examining researchers' notions about it. Methods : The results of the survey were analysed with SPSS.12.0 of which frequency analysis, ANOVA, Two sample t-test and chi-squared test were carried out. Results : The study's major findings were as below. As for the general information of the respondents, women outnumbered men and most of them were in their 30s making their livings as researchers. Their major was mostly biotechnology. Specifically, many specialized in indirect clinical research such as studying human tissues and cells and had master's degrees. As asked their awareness of clinical research ethics related laws and systems, 34% of respondents said they were well aware. Also, those who received related education proved to be more aware of laws and systems than those who didn't. Among the respondents, those whose research plans were reviewed by IRB outnumbered those whose plans had never been. The main reason for IRB review was to 'publish papers in foreign journals' Asked how they found IRB review, most of them stated that there were too complicated procedures for documentation and too many formal documents required and called for the simplification of the procedures. As for questions asking what was the most important to raise levels of clinical research ethics, enactment and enforcement of more strict laws topped the list. Those who received ethics education emphasized the importance of the education more than those who didn't. The analysis showed statistically significant difference. Conclusion : Most of researchers generally made positive assessments on IRB review but they complained of the complicated procedures and requirements. In this regard, IRB review needed to be simplified. Most of them had only partial awareness of laws and systems which would serve as basic standards when they carried out clinical research. Therefore, to raise the levels of research ethics, more systematic and regular education programs need to be developed and implemented to get substantial results. Key words : Clinical research, Researcher, clinical research ethics, awareness and attitudes

목차 (Table of Contents)