공지
- [ 2024-06-28 ] 2024년 하반기(7월) 유전자검사기관 종사자 교육 안내
- [ 2024-06-12 ] 2024년 하반기 DTC 유전자검사기관 검사역량인증 사업 설명회 개...
- [ 2024-06-11 ] 2024 연명의료결정제도 수기·영상 공모전 안내
- [ 2024-06-05 ] [제63회 콜로키움] (구)독일 형법상 '업무상 자살 지원' 금지의 ...
- [ 2024-06-05 ] 2024년 한국간호윤리학회 세미나 개최 안내(6/22(토))
관련 논문
*정책원 미소장 자료이며 관련 논문 소개 게시판입니다. 게시물 관련링크를 눌러 소속기관에서 열람가능한지 확인해주시기 바랍니다.
lib@nibp.kr
글 수 4,668
| 발행년 : | 2015 |
|---|---|
| 구분 : | 국내학술지 |
| 학술지명 : | 圓光法學 |
| 관련링크 : | http://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101016982 |
제3자가 관여된 생식보조기술의 법제화를 위한 제언
= A Proposal for Legislation of Assisted Reproductive Technology Involving a Third Party
- 저자[authors] 김성은(Kim, Sung-Eun)
- 학술지명[periodical name] 圓光法學
- 권호사항[Volume/Issue] Vol.31No.3[2015]
- 발행처[publisher] 원광대학교 법학연구소
- 자료유형[Document Type] 학술저널
- 수록면[Pagination] 1-19
- 발행년[Publication Year] 2015
- KDC[Korean Decimal Classification] 360
- 주제어[descriptor] self-decision,Artificial Insemination by Semen derived from Donor(AID),Reproductive rights,민법 제844조,비배우자간의 인공수정,child welfare,benefit of the children,civil law article number 844,자의 복리,리프로덕티브 라이츠,자기결정권
초록[abstracts]
[While reproductive medical technologies have been steadily introduced to the society because of rapid technological development, the relevant systems for their proper implementation, such as the legal regulation, are still insufficient. Currently, the improvement of relevant laws for proper response to and implementation of various issues surrounding reproductive medical technologies—including the legal status of a newborn baby—are considered as the most urgent tasks. As for the effectiveness of reproductive medical technologies involving a third party, such issues as the right of self-decision of pregnant women, human dignity, and child welfare, including pregnancy and delivery risks, are being discussed, but they are never connected to the improvement of relevant laws. Nonetheless, given that everyone can already have a child through the use of reproductive medical technology and that the relevant operation can be conducted in Korea and in foreign countries, even if it is prohibited by law, it is more important to identify the problems that can be caused by the reproductive medical technologies involving a third party than to unconditionally prohibit the technologies. Moreover, it is more desirable to control reproductive medical technologies through the establishment of a public institution that can provide relevant information, counseling, and mental care so relevant parties can secure their right of self-decision. What is the most important in implementing reproductive medical technologies is to give consideration to the preservation of the legal status of the fetus to be born as well as its welfare. The review on the legal device is necessary to ensure that persons with no responsibility do not suffer any disadvantage while sufficiently taking in consideration the right to the pursuit of happiness by the infertile couples and the right of self-decision of the providers.]
목차[Table of content]
Ⅰ. 서 론 Ⅱ. 제3자가 관여된 생식보조기술의 유형 Ⅲ. 생식보조기술을 둘러싼 제문제 Ⅳ. 결론 및 법제화를 위한 제언
(†04522) 서울 특별시 중구 남대문로 113 DB다동빌딩 5층
TEL : 02-737-8970 (기획운영팀)
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
Copyright (c)KONIBP All Right Reserved.
2sisstore
