[번역문] 유전자 형질변환 식품의 실험에 대한 철학적 견해
= A Philosophical Perspective on the Testing of Transgenic Foods

 
제어번호 100708063
저자명 Andrew Woodfield  ,유원기(번역자)
학술지명 인문학연구
권호사항 Vol.49 No.- [2015] 
발행처 계명대학교 인문과학연구소 
자료유형 학술저널
수록면 213-234(22쪽)
언어 Korean
발행년도 2015년
판매처 (주)누리미디어

 
초록
The topic of the present talk is substantial equivalence. The thinking is roughly this. If food derived from a certain plant has been consumed for a long time by human beings or by animals without causing a health problem, that provides good evidence that the plant is safe. When plant breeders produce a new strain of the same kind of plant, and the new strain is substantially equivalent to the parental variety, it is rational to expect that the new strain will likewise be safe ? even if food from it has not yet been eaten. If a transgenic version of the plant is substantially equivalent to the parental variety, then it is rational to expect that this too will be safe.
 Amazingly, and fortunately, no major public health disasters have arisen, not yet. However, it is still possible that future evidence might reveal that these crops have caused long-term damage to public health. In fact, it is impossible to prove conclusively that any food is safe. What we can say is that now, in 2015, it is reasonable to believe that you won’t get suddenly sick after eating the now familiar GM soy or corn, or from processed foods containing them. But you should be aware that there might be longer term effects, including an increased risk of cancer from herbicide residues in food derived from ht crops.

 
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가는 글
Ⅱ. 제초제에 대한 내성을 가진 농작물의 식품 안전성 검사
Ⅲ. 내부에서 살충제를 산출하는 농작물의 안정성 검사
Ⅳ. 결론

주제어
Substantial equivalence  ,Transgenic Foods  ,GMO  ,Monsanto  ,Glyphosate  ,Genomics  ,Food Safety