안락사에 대한 태도분석
 :  전공의와 사법연수생의 비교 = An Analysis of Attitudes on Euthanasia between Residents and Judicial Apprentices

• 저자명

  손명세 ,이경환 ,강희철 ,유종호 ,권오병 ,김경곤

• 학술지명

  Korean Journal of Family Medicine

  
  

• 권호사항

  Vol.26 No.6 [2005]

• 발행처

  대한가정의학회(Korean Academy of Family Medicine)

• 발행처 URL

  http://www.kafm.or.kr

• 자료유형

  학술저널

• 수록면

  15-24(10쪽)

• 언어

  -

• 발행년도

  2005년

• KDC

  597

• 등재정보

  KCI등재

• KCI 피인용횟수

  5

• 주제어

  적극적 안락사 ,소극적 안락사 ,안락사

• 제공처

   한국연구재단 에서 제공하는 논문입니다.

• 초록 (Abstract)
  • Background: Recently, the legal and ethical issues relative to euthanasia are becoming controversial in Korea. This study was designed to verify the differences of the attitudes on euthanasia between judicial apprentices and residents. Methods: The questionnaire was conducted on the 35th-group of the judicial apprentices on March 24, 2004, and on the residents from April 2 to May 22, 2004. The respondents were 636 in total consisting of 460 judicial apprentices and 176 residents.Results: Of the total 636 subjects, 373 (81.1%) of the judicial apprentices and 149 (84.7%) of residents agreed that allowing euthanasia is moral, without any significant difference (P〉0.05). The number of residents was greater (59 people, 33.5%) than that of judicial apprentices (112 people, 24.4%) who agreed with active euthanasia (P〈0.05). Among the total, 397 (86.3%) of the judicial apprentices and 160 (91.4%) of the residents answered that the law for euthanasia was necessary, without any significant difference (P〉0.05). But, among these supporters, the respondents who agreed on active euthanasia were significantly different in number between judicial apprentices (n=93, 23.4%) and residents (n=54, 33.8%) (P〈0.05). Conclusion: This study did not find any significant differences between the two groups in the necessity of the law for euthanasia, but the rate of agreement on active euthanasia was higher in residents group than in judicial apprentices group.